Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TradeTec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow delete. (This should have been speedily deleted, and no doubt would have been if the speedy deletion tag had not been removed, without any explanation.)

TradeTec

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion contested. Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete WP:NCORP, so WP:A7 applies. CSD removed by new user (not author) without valid justification.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find any sources —Мандичка^YO 😜 10:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.