Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trading Advantage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

(non-admin closure) The result was Speedy Delete per WP:G11.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 06:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trading Advantage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is Self-promotion and publicity, does not meet Notability guidelines. 114.35.118.182 (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I completed the nom for the IP. ansh 666 17:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, because the sources used are the company website, YouTube videos, and two "consumer report" agencies. Those sources along with the tone used in the writing seals the deal on a delete for me.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 19:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete pretty clear case CorporateM (Talk) 02:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated the article for speedy deletion per WP:G11.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 02:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.