Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional Congregation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 17:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Traditional Congregation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod with no reason given. A synagogue that has all of the things you'd expect, and some very good kitchens apparantly. Unfortunately it has no claim to notability and no resources Nuttah68 08:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability. Kind of reads like a brochure. Nateji77 09:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:N, written like an advert and probably COI. VanTucky (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not really a website for this church as most of the content on the page belongs on their site Corpx 01:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a NN synagogue (not church). If the article survives this AFD process, it should be moved to a title incorporating the name of the place where it is. The present title is misleadingly general. Peterkingiron 22:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think a good many local congregations would turn out to be notable if enough local material were examined, but it certainly isn't shown here. the name is he same problem as with churches that call themselves simply "Church of Christ" and the like--if the articles are kept the place name is added. DGG (talk) 16:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.