Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traedakidd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Traedakidd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam created in violation of Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. Non notable artist. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 21:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:44, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant independent coverage. His claim to fame appears to be a 100k view youtube video, and a single local article. These do not satisfy GNG. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 16:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see how its considered spam by AfD nominator. The artist does show notability; as mentioned by Vibe [1] and WQHT [2]. 84.255.215.92 (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No depth of coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The artist is well known rap star which is shown by his mtv.com profile.Banty Banty 123 (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MTV. "This site contains content from artists, fans, and writers from around the internet in it's natural form." Not an independent reliable source. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO - does not belong in an encyclopedia just yet. ‑‑Dstone66 ⑆^(talk)⑇^(contribs)⑈ 22:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.