- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus, defaulting to keep (although transwiki to wiktionary appears to make little sense). Kusma (討論) 04:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is nothing more than a dictionary entry, transfer to Wiktionary. --Hetar 07:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and move to Wiktionary Snailwalker | talk 11:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary and delete. (aeropagitica) 12:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete does wiktionary even want this? --Bachrach44 19:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
transwiki/del. Mind you, the idea of a supergroup featuring Winwood, Capaldi, Zawinul and Pastorius is intriguing...Grutness...wha? 00:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC) (see below)[reply]- Keep Enthusiastic editor flagged this within the first minute of its appearance, give it time to grow. --Hooperbloob 20:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- mmyeah. Does look a little better already. changing vote to a weak keep. Grutness...wha? 00:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep This could prove to be a useful article, and is growing beyond the scope of a mere dictionary entry.Sethimothy 00:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. Radagast83 18:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.