Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendent thought

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transcendent thought (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Disjointed original research essay Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unsourced gibberish. Hqb (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Tevildo (talk) 11:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Peridon (talk) 12:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - psychotic, drug-induced or otherwise incoherent. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - when I die, I will go to Deletionpedia Franciscrot (talk) 13:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. kyle mew 01:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylemew (talk • contribs)
• Delete self-evident. JuJube (talk) 01:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.