Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcience of time
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page ☎ ) 06:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The creator of this article later had doubts about the accuracy. Other people have been unable to verify it. ZPMMaker of the Cleanup Taskforce investigated, and was unable to confirm it after exhaustive checking, see notes at talk:Transcience of time. There fore, propose delete as inaccurate. RJFJR 17:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't this qualify for Speedy since the author is accepting the unverifiability? --Daedalus-Prime 18:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 19:28, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cannot find any information regarding this topic, and the author has no sources - assumed invalid. ZPMMaker 22:33, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as above Pete.Hurd 18:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.