Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfer path analysis
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Transfer path analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Context is vague, but not IMHO vague enough for A1 CSD. It was listed as a copyvio, but most of that has been cleaned out. But in the end, I just do not see any indication that the subject is notable. TexasAndroid (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are a lot of technical papers on Google that might show notability, but a lot of what comes up is nearly as dense as the article itself. These might be useful for researching and creating a more comprehensive article, but right now the article doesn't seem to have that track in mind. Also, WP:NOTMANUAL seems to be relevant. BassoProfundo (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The creator of the article made a comment (now viewable on the article's talk page) that s/he would like to work on the article in a non-public namespace until it is ready for inclusion. This seems to indicate the creator and primary editor's desire to temporarily delete the page. BassoProfundo (talk) 23:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, under criterion G7. (article has already been moved to the user namespace) blurredpeace ☮ 00:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.