- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Non notable company subtly advertising ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 21:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Translitepc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced; no claim of notability per WP:GNG; doesn't add anything that isn't on Lexan or polycarbonate; company isn't notable enough to merge per WP:PRODUCT; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by anonymous IP editor. Altered Walter (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Canuck89 (converse with me) 22:11, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as the one who originally PROD'd it, for the reasons listed above. InShaneee (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article seems to be about one particular brand of UV-stabilized polycarbonate sheeting. I could find no secondary sources for "Translitepc"; There are many hits for "Translite", but none I found seemed to be about polycarbonate products. Without independent sources, the topic does not meet notability thresholds. However, I disagree with the nom that the Lexan or polycarbonate articles contain all that is in this article. In particular, UV-stabilized polycarbonate is not mentioned in these articles. Perhaps some generic subset of this article describing UV-stabilization could be merged into the polycarbonate article, if a suitable reference is available. Mark viking (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.