- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Transmog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor fictional gadget. No secondary sources, no explanation of relevance. Fails WP:FICT and the primary notability guideline. Huon (talk) 13:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 16:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I checked, and I cannot find any places where the term has been used in any other significant books or scholarly work, so I feel that it fails WP:GNG Chzz ► 20:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Extremely trivial plot element. Obviously not covered in any detail by secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.