Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparent Armor Gun Shield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems sufficient consensus that the additional available sourcing is sufficient to satisfy notability (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent Armor Gun Shield

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Transparent Armor Gun Shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Military hardware, sourced only to a press release. A search finds only one sort of reliable source ([1]), making this fail WP:GNG. Sandstein 15:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Armor magazine has a full-page article in this issue on page six. Together with the Defense Industry Daily source mentioned above is enough to pass GNG. The press release in the article is from the vendor, so a poor source for notability, but there is also a USMC press release which has more significance to my mind. There are also numerous passing mentions such as this book and this. SpinningSpark 18:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Spinningspark. Subject seems notable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources found by Spinningspark. Widely deployed military kit is typically notable, and in this case the sources are there. Icewhiz (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.