Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transport in East Anglia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Both the nomination and the lone delete !vote are based on WP:USELESS. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transport in East Anglia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete This page has no use at all!!!!!!!! Highhousefarm1 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Fixed nom. Please close seven days after 12:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Keep or at worse merge into Transport in England which strangely does not mention buses at all. -84user (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we don't need this directory. Better for it to be a category. 22:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep The nominator has failed to cite any policy as to why this should be deleted. The arguement of "make it a category" is redundant, per WP:CLN. A perfectly valid top-level page that links to the other articles. Lugnuts (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It could do with some prose, but I don't see why Wikipedia shouldn't have an article with this title. --Pontificalibus (talk) 20:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This pages has lots of links to it. It is not a directory so why should it be deleted? Wilbysuffolk (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WE ARE LOSSING THE REGIONS WORTH OF GOOD PAGES ABOUT TRANSPORT. WE NEED TO SAVE IT NOW!! Wilbysuffolk (talk) 07:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page should really be a prose article covering all forms of transport in the region with relevant links embedded in sections, something like Transport in Buckinghamshire only less skewed towards railways. Keep anyway, since no policy-based reason for deletion has been given and there's potential for improvement. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; certainly an encyclopædic subject, I think - covering transport for a whole region. The current article content is poor, but can be rescued - that's best fixed with normal editing rather than deletion. As others have said, it needs prose. bobrayner (talk) 10:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.