Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transworld Aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 04:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transworld Aviation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, one reference which is a broken link, article consists of two sentences and an infobox. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 01:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CORPDEPTH and with only one aircraft, I can't see that changing. St★lwart¹¹¹ 04:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Along with the other defunct airlines in the navbox at the bottom of the page, perhaps added for the sake of completeness when they were founded? None of them lasted very long. and none look notable enough for a separate article. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it was operation for a number of years with a Boeing 737 (search for images of JY-TWC) so is of note, agree not a very good article but no need to delete. MilborneOne (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Owning one large plane makes them notable? That seems unlikely.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not notable it is the fact they operated services with the aircraft that makes them notable. MilborneOne (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That't not how it works I'm afraid. Read WP:CORPDEPTH which is fails. Non-notable company. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 20:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/Notability is of further use in that regard. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no evidence it was a scheduled airline, so it is presumably not notable. DGG ( talk ) 07:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: probably because it was a passenger airline operating a freighter. MilborneOne (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.