Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Gordon (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Gordon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

dubious notability really a stretch, obvious COI issues. note first afd closed no consensus Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The Wired article and Ain't It Cool News article mention him sufficiently, he is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.10.219 (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I've removed sources and information from the article that was purely promotional or asserted notability based on an unreliable or non-independent source. There are a few IMDB references I've left on there because they support WP:V for some of the films produced. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 19:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Travis is a notable webseries creator Showzampa (talk) 21:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.