Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Riddle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 01:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a multiple nomination, here are the other articles nominated:

• Retards 101
• Ghosts Blow
• Chicken Pie Studios

Who is Travis Riddle? A flagrant self publicist from what I can see in these articles. Written by a User:EightSlicesOfPie, this also happens to be Riddle's handle in their forums and on their contact page. Is he notable? Are any of his projects notable? Neither of their domains, http://www.retards101.com/ nor http://www.colonelsandurz.com/ gets any Alexa rank. His webcomic, incidentally is part of the UTurn Creative Studios, which incidentally had another webcomic deleted a few weeks back here. Travis is not a notable human, and his projects are non notable websites. Wikipedia is not the place for this. - Hahnchen 00:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 00:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
• Delete as a non-notable webcomic. Also, in addition to the above mentioned, there are only 121 Google results [1]--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 00:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -Dawson 00:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn webstuff, per nom Deizio 01:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn webcomic, vanity.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 01:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn,vain Ronabop 01:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn webcomic, and per nom. Funnybunny ^(talk) _{Vote for this policy} 03:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. —Whouk (talk) 08:49, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 09:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn webcomic and per nom. --Terence Ong 10:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. Blatant vanispamcruftisement. Just zis Guy you know? 12:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 14:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. --Bob 15:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vanicruft ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 18:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable webcomic.--Dakota ~ 21:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.