- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 04:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Travis Senik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:ATHLETE. In addition, I haven't found any sources that provide more than incidental coverage of the subject (game recaps, stat lists, etc.). Cptmurdok (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The following are sources that reference the subject in a manner that are from secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. After reading the discussion on Athletes, I find it incredulous that the people on that thread can somehow determine what level of athletics is notable and what isn't. The general notability guidelines seem like the correct place to go to judge notability...but what I can't seem to figure out is how if local/national/international media feel the subject is noteworthy enough to report on, the editors at Wiki somehow know better and presume themselves to be better judges of notability when it relates to athletics than those who cover the field for their vocation.
From the 1999-2000 CCIW preview.
Senik started every game for Wheaton at the point guard spot last season, leading the team with an average of four assists per game. Senik also added 9.4 points and 4.1 rebounds per game. Harris says of Senik, "Travis Senik is a winner, it is that simple. He does everything that helps us win Championships. He handles the ball effectively, regardless of pressure. He knows who to get the ball to and when. He is also without a doubt our best and most versatile defender." http://www.d3hoops.com/previews/00/mwestmen.htm
Senik was Athlete of the Week according to a little read paper called the LA Times. http://articles.latimes.com/1996-04-16/news/ss-59267_1_county-athlete
Bhtower (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)bhtower — Bhtower (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete, being a star high school or Division III college player doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Never played professional sports on any level... has local notability only. Spanneraol (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. Not only did the subject not play professionally, but Div III is the lowest-level of NCAA college athletics in the US. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 06:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above. Alex (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.