Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree of Life (video game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tree of Life (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game with no evidence of notability. Sources are generally neither independent nor reliable and appear to be self promotion, press releases and niche reviews. I moved this to Draft space to give it time to be developer but the author immediately moved it back in to main-space. It is certainly very far from being ready for mainspace and fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete was deleted as non-notable less than a year ago. I'm unconvinced that there has been a sea change in coverage. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article as it stands does not have the sourcing to indicate notability. I checked MobyGames to see if there was more sourcing out there, but they list no reviews for this game. None. That's not definitive, but definitely doesn't give hope that we could find a lot more coverage with some research.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.