Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree of life (phylogenetics)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Tree of life (biology). —Darkwind (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tree of life (phylogenetics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't figure out what this is even. CSD was declined with comment that it's far from not making sense. It seems to have something to do with the Tree of Life Web Project, but what I can't figure out. Is it an example, if so why just this one type, and why not on the page about the Tree of Life Web Project. Bottom line right now there's nothing useable as far as I can tell Caffeyw (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or possibly Redirect to Tree of life (biology) While the Tree of life is a highly notable concept, we already have much better articles on this topic, in the form of Tree of life (biology) or Phylogenetic tree. I recommend deletion, but if others think Tree of life (phylogenetics) could be a reasonable search term, redirect is fine, too. --Mark viking (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or Delete as per Mark viking. It clearly duplicates the concept of Tree of life (biology) without providing any novel content. I guess it is possible someone might search for the term. Agricolae (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/merge' as suggested. That it duplicates other articles is a reason for deletion, that it does not make sense shows if anything a failure to read those other articles. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect (or merge), seems like a valid search term, see e.g. book titles likes The Tree of Life: A Phylogenetic Classification Christian75 (talk) 10:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.