- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tan ǀ 39 16:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tremere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There is no evidence of notability, no references independent of White Wolf (or "unofficial" fan-based material), and the article consists primarily of in-universe description. This should be transferred to the White Wolf wiki and deleted here for this lack of notability. --Craw-daddy | T | 15:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 15:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to a more general article on the clans and groupings in these games which can be written from a real-world perspective. For such a popular RPG world there have to be articles and interviews etc. with the designers talking about their creation, which would help with the real-world perspective. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 23:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep the article definitely needs better references but, if memory serves it was used independent of "White Wolf" for the Ars Magica game (as I remember it Ars Magica was produced by someone other than "White Wolf" and then appropriated. Some coverage exists in non-white wolf sources (Spokane Spokesman-Review - NewsBank - Jul 27, 1996, Bangkok Post - Factiva, from Dow Jones - Apr 20, 2005, Computer Gaming World - AccessMyLibrary.com - Apr 6, 2004, and Star-Herald Saturday, June 29, 2002. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural Keep considering that the remaining sects of this in-game universe also exist. You can't take one away without addressing the others. I would be more open to a discussion of an AfD on the combined groups together. Trusilver 21:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.