Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triacontakaiheptagonal number
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mangojuicetalk 14:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally prod'd, with the reason being given as "Wikipedia is not infinite. This article is not encyclopaedic. The only "interesting property" mentioned is having an awkward name. The related article triacontakaiheptagon was deleted per Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Enneacontakaienneagon." I concurred with a {{prod2}}, and I concur now. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Figurate number. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-04 23:44Z- Comment As an alternative to my deletion request, redirect to Polygonal number without merge. But I still think it should be deleted. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 06:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I looked more closely at the article and I don't see anything interesting about it, as Arthur Rubin said (why not a 36-gonal number or 43-gonal number?). —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-05 07:20Z
- Delete unless there's anything special about such numbers. — Pt (T) 11:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete They are the values of a non-integral quadratic. Nothing special about them either visible or likely. Septentrionalis 13:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.