Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triangle Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Persistently unsourced article on one of many minor bootleg record labels. I'd vote Weak keep with considerable trimming if reliable sources (per Wikipedia policy) could be found for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th sentences. Paragraphs 2 & 3 (of 4 total) seem entirely promotional and assert no connection to the article topic beyond "in spirit"

the label survives in spirit by the work of a remasterer living in FRANCE aka Texas Barbudos sharing music for free and worldknown for the high quality of his remastered bootlegs

I acknowledge that Triangle Records existed, and I'm certain that with a few peacocky WP:PUFF links this article could clear the notability bar, but it would still be fundamentally uninformative beyond some bootleg imprint that put out rock CDs -- here are a few titles found in my record collection. / edg ☺ ☭ 19:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing to have significant coverage in independent third party sources. Ping my talk page if sources are added to the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.