Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribute to Eric Rohmer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tribute to Eric Rohmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film clip of questionable notability. Only provided reference is a dead link, and other than the title of the YouTube clip, there's no way to know if this was really made by Godard or not. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing found about the film on Google suggesting it doesn't exist. Surely a film by one of the greatest directors on another great director would have some coverage? Hoax article? Lugnuts (talk) 18:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Keep - sources found to establish notability. Good work! Lugnuts (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I have fixed the link to the article. The reference is about 3/4 of the way down. This is a real film, I included a link to the film itself as posted on youtube. You kids need to stick to cleaning up childish vandalism and leave the rest of us alone. Yinzland 18:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Not a hoax. or Redirect/Merge this stub to Eric Rohmer as the film tribute is about him. This hommage exists and was indeed screened at the "Soirée en hommage à Eric Rohmer" at Cinémathèque française,[1] but it does not (yet) have the coverage to meet WP:NF. If it recieves distribution and coverage, it might always be spun back out. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Its existence seems to have been satisfactorily established. Its notability was never in serious doubt. Varlaam (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.