- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Trickster. howcheng {chat} 00:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article merely defines 'Trickery using an unattributed quote - nothing of substance, no links - seemingly well-intentioned attempt but ultimately empty - Wiktionary does it much much better Madman 15:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Except for the first sentence, this is a perfectly encyclopedic stub about tricksters. As it happens, though, we already have a better article about them at Trickster. Redirect there (or perhaps to the disambig at Trick). —Cryptic (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Cryptic. Endomion 18:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Cryptic. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 20:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per above. Hamster Sandwich 23:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.