- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cbrown1023 talk 16:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Triggerslip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Looks like a smallish local band without being known outside the area, hence non-notable. Many small bands have produced an album that haven't appeared on Wiki; it's being notable that warrants a place within Wiki. Drivenapart (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I was unable to find any independent reviews from reliable sources. Fails all other criteria of WP:MUSIC. -Seidenstud (talk) 17:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the way it stands. If the EW article does exist, it could be cited, but until then, does not meet WP:MUSIC. Tnxman307 (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources indicates to me that the article fails to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.