Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trijit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 23:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trijit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional/advertising page for apparent nn company, recreated after being speedied last year. Article creator appears to be company founder. No independent or verifiable third party sources. Google search on "Trijit Technologies" brings up only seven entries. Delete MikeWazowski (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Everything about the article seems to be promotional. Article has been created and largely edited by three single purpose accounts, at least one of which appears to belong to someone who works for the company. One of these three editors has posted on the article's talk page "Many companies outside India want to get the information about IT Company which provides the training servcices. As NIIT and its competitors information is there in wikipedia. Its relevant to provide the information about Trijit". The article gives no independent sources. This looks to me like a statement that the purpose is to use the article for publicity purposes. I have searched and found no evidence of notability. Of teh 7 Google hits for "Trijit Technologies", three are to Wikipedia or Wikimedia commons, two are to the company's own web site, and the other two are to the business listing sit www.hotfrog.in. That site says "Anyone can list their business in HotFrog ... Listing in HotFrog directs sales leads and enquiries to your business." (quoted from http://www.hotfrog.in/AboutUS.aspx). Thus we have no independent sources at all: other web sources have produced similar results. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google search on "Trijit" brings up more results rather than searching "Trijit Technologies". I know both Trijit and NIIT in Indian market. It can not be said that information included by authors or others about the competitors is only for publicity purpose. In my view, Trijit's Info. is the other face of the same coin which must be there on Wikipedia. Desired information searched by the user about Trijit is there on wikipedia but edition of the article is required and reference should be added. I think, after certain period of time, various user will improve this article. Uridhima ujala (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)—[reply]

Uridhima ujala (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete unless someone comes up with third party sources demonstrating notability. This may or may not be notable, but currently there's only a reference to Alexa, which is hardly enough to establish notability. Hairhorn (talk) 22:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Keep Apart from Alexa, i found info. on jigsaw as a notability. Only by searching on google, its not enough to say that this article has not notability. Article has good information about Trijit which is required but enough time should be given to other users to edit this article. My strongly recommendation is not to delete this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.88.227 (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC) —[reply]

122.166.88.227 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete - Can not find any coverage in Indian financial media (or any mainstream media). Does not meet WP:COMPANY--Sodabottle (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The only references are to either the company's own site or mere business listing sites which give a few factual details like the companay's address and the fact that the company's web site is not in the top 100000 in terms of numbers of visits (we are not told how far below the 100000th mark it comes). There is no way that this could conceivably be taken as indicating notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.