- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was rewritten and kept. GRBerry 18:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Trilateral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incoherent article, more like personal reflection than an encyclopedia article. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination The dab page now existing bears no relation to the rubbish that I originally nominated for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This article may need editing by a more experienced wikipedia writer as opposed to deletion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jen.carrol (talk • contribs)
- Convert to DAB page Someone feel free to revert me if they think I'm being hasty, but I'm going to convert this article to a dab page as originally suggested at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_September_9#Category:Trilateral. GDallimore (Talk) 19:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've made the edits I think are appropriate. Leaving it to others to decide now... GDallimore (Talk) 20:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on GDallimore's changes. Probably could be expanded to list other meanings. Agree with JamesBWatson - the original was incoherent. I would support a speedy closure. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep thanks to changes - no problems now. Johnbod (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose Speedy close as withdrawn with no remaining Delete votes. (I'm not going to do it, as I'm involved in the related category deletion !vote). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, per withdrawn nomination, and conversion to disambiguation page.Smallman12q (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.