Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple man powerbomb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Professional wrestling double-team maneuvers#Aided powerbomb. after deletion. J04n(talk page) 23:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Triple man powerbomb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestling move, and article is substantially about not-that-topic anyway. DMacks (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Professional wrestling double-team maneuvers#Aided powerbomb. The page is more about The Shield (professional wrestling) rather than the move, but I think the title would better be off pointing to the maneuver. Funny ^Pika! 14:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. After deletion, it will be perfectly OK to re-create it as a redirect, but there is no good reason to keep the existing content (which is largely off-topic, and poorly written) in the article's history, and there is indeed a reason for not keeping it, as it includes at least some copyright infringing text. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and don't bother redirecting, as I can't find any evidence that their finisher is even known by this name.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my original PROD. Non-notable wrestling move, and would not make a good redirect since I doubt many wrestling fans would use this search term, if the move is even known by this name. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (after deletion is fine) - not notable. Redirect per Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unencyclopedic fan gushing. Non referenced this is a series of fan articles made by this editor that really doesn't have a place here. Appears to be a violation of WP:NOR and or WP:SYN. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with deletion of the article but it should later be redirected to the section mentioned earlier.--64.229.164.74 (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete with no prejudice against recreation as a redirect per FunnyPika's suggestion above. This "article" is nothing more than the creator's personal diary of his opinion on WWE events. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.