Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trollaxor (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was overwhelming delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The original AfD on this was closed as no consensus and challenged at Deletion Review. There, about 70% of people sought to overturn that closure to a deletion based on concerns over the validity of many comments in the orignial AfD debate. That level, however, is insufficient to directly mandate a different AfD result, so it returns here for reconsideration instead. -Splashtalk 19:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of verifiability, as before. I've brought up the lack of sources on the talk page, and the best anyone's been able to do is point to his own forum postings for "verification". Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. Friday (talk) 19:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it is an article with the heavy scent of advertising and self promotion which Wiki is not. doktorb 19:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per per User:Friday --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 19:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Trollvertisement. —Cryptic (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; fails to show any references indicating that anybody other than himself is interested in his varied writings. *Dan T.* 15:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable, unencyclopedic, and easily a Speedy candidate for notability reasons. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above reasons. Grue 20:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Everything above. Ashibaka tock 23:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Troll cruft, not notable. jni 16:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ridiculous troll cruft. --DDG 17:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.