Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrossmanPrinciple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 23:15, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A cursory Google will reveal that this does not exist, and the page itself implies that the writer took it upon him/herself to name an idiosyncratic observation after themselves. Jogloran 12:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per WP:NOR DES ^(talk) 18:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. My only source for this [article] is my own observation of this pattern in small startups and enormous companies alike, i.e. it's original research. Sliggy 18:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Relisting, not enough discussion. Redwolf24 (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 00:30, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above reasons - Dalbury 01:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above reasons (just voting to make sure there are enough for consensus). --Jacquelyn Marie 01:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOR and NN vanity. - Sensor 02:04, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. DV8 2XL 02:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR --Rogerd 00:25, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.