Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trouble on Broadway
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A1 and WP:SNOW
- Trouble on Broadway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It seems to be a short play, whose dialogues and scenes are described in the article. Shovon (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Could have been speedily deleted under A7 for no claim of notability. Can be deleted as lacking any secondary sources, so fails validity and reliable sources. That said, it sounds like it might be a play created by students for a school assembly. Wikipedia is not a place for original publication of works of fiction. Edison (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No context and no sources of any kind, fails WP:V and WP:N. Moreover, a healthy dose of WP:OR as the article consists almost entirely of a copy of the actual play or a scene from it. Nsk92 (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Napsterbater (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if this can be properly sourced and is verified as GFDL friendly, it belongs on Wikisource. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 23:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The actual script of a play has no place on Wikipedia. Editors above me raise good points about verifiability and notability as well. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - This is a script, not an article. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Methinks its snowing Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 21:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.