Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TruePlanning Software Model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TruePlanning Software Model

WP:NN proprietary software, advertisement written as a response to a competitor's article. Toddst1 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable, un-referenced, corporate spam; "TruePlanning software" gets a whopping six g-hits, and "TruePlanning software model" gets zero outside of this article. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Baffling, badly written essay full of original research, referenced to some fellow's thesis and to other Wikipedia articles. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject. Two "references" are included in the aticle, but neither mention the model, so it also fails verifiability. I don't think it's over the top enough to be blatant advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural comment. Chrispfister (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), the original editor of the article, has been blocked for 24 hours for disruption for removing the AfD tags from the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.