Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsuen Wan Transport Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (SK1). Withdrawn by nominator here [1], procedural reclosing, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tsuen Wan Transport Complex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Unremarkable transport hub, no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, fails WP:GNG. WWGB (talk) 04:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've long wondered why railway stations are automatically notable but bus stations aren't. (Satnavs seem to ignore bus stations too - very frustrating at times...) Peridon (talk) 09:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable hub of buses and ferries. Connected to West Rail station. Jeremy Hopkins (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have expanded the article and added ideas for further improvement on the talk page. One source mentions that it was "The first of its kind in Hong Kong", being at the time of construction a hub for road and water transport. A search through Chinese language sources should yield additional results. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Underwaterbuffalo's additions to the article have established notability and encyclopedic worthiness of the topic. Der yck C. 11:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.