- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tunebite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG, fails WP:NPRODUCT. Onel5969 TT me 11:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete, there's a modest amount of borderline reliable tech sites that provide introductions to how to use Tunebite, but between the weak source quality and the superficial nature of the analysis therein, I don't think it meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 16:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.