Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tungsten pentoxide
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. EdJohnston (talk) 03:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tungsten pentoxide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete unsourced one-liner about a chemical - not all chemical combinations are notable and nothing here indicates that this one is. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Delete. It doesn't seem notable; it might be worthwhile enough for a mention in the main article.--mordicai. (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit: Tag & expand. It has been brought to my attention that there is a category (& sub-cats) for these compounds, which makes me think this isn't just a dangling thread. Tag {{expert-subject|chemistry}} and {{chemical-importance}} & let expand into a stub, I think. Give it a chance. --mordicai. (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Needs expansion, but seems no more or less notable than the rest of Category:Tungstates. Falls outside my area of expertise, unfortunately (I can't really decipher the Google links I'm coming up with), but I see no reason to assume this isn't just a seed article in need of cultivation. The article's less than two days old. Ford MF (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; it's obviously verifiable from the more reliable of sources; it's unlikely that anything that could appear vaguely relevant to the article would touch on libel or even POV. There's only so many basic oxides and other simple compounds, so I see no reason to delete.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep needs to fleshed out, but that's what stub-tags are for.Yilloslime (t) 23:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.