- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 00:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Magazine created this month. Definitely nn. Admission of vanispamcruftisement on the talk page. Contested prod. MER-C 10:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no assertion of notability, combined with an assertion of self-promotion. --Stormie 14:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, WP:VSCA, promo piece. Mr Stephen 19:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A very new publication which has not established encyclopaedic notability (not yet at least). Dorange 10:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Self-promotion. - 52 Pickup 17:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it is still there a year later and has managed to establish itself in popular culture it may warrant an article. But Wikipedia is no room for publication announcements! Particularly for non-notable publications. User:Dimadick
- Delete as Tomfoolery, self-promotional stub about a non-notable magazine. Most importantly, as unsourcedOhconfucius 15:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Author has achieved something by keeping this nonsense on Wiki for the length of time it takes for this process to be completed. SilkTork 17:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.