Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turing-test Argument for the Existence of God
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. El_C 13:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Turing-test Argument for the Existence of God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Should be deleted. Not only original research but also just silly. The turing test doesn't test belief at all. It only tests practical applications. The turing test requires at a bare minimum, interraction, and this article obviously claims none. Original author removed Prod without discussion. Dipics 22:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per submitter. Does not attempt to establish that the argument is notable, but is rather written as a persuasive essay; a rehash of the blog entry linked to in the article. JGardner 22:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not a published argument, and blatant original research. DoomsDay349 22:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR and a terrible argument at that - a textbook example of Begging the question GabrielF 23:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blatant WP:OR and borderline WP:BOLLOCKS. MartinDK 23:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Calling it WP:OR would be a compliment; it's nonsense. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 07:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sadly, CSD G1 specifically excludes poor writing and implausible theories. --RoninBKETC 09:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC) That's fifteen seconds of my life that I will never get back...[reply]
- Delete: pubphilosophycruft, complete bollocks. Cheers, Sam Clark 08:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Varano 15:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.