- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable neologism, apparently has only happened on the Australian version of Big Brother NawlinWiki 13:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The term pre-dates this particular incident and the reference to big brother pushes it beyond a dictdef. Ace of Sevens 14:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ace of Sevens. --Arnzy (whats up?) 14:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect into Teabagging, were an alternative name (Windmilling) is alredy present.--blue520 14:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This isn't quite the same thing as teabagging. If anything, I'd move windmilling to this article. Ace of Sevens 15:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeah, I agree. --Deon555|talk 04:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep apparently a notable term that has seen use and exposure on television. Also, apparently can be a crime. Seems interesting and worthy of an article. Yanksox 15:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is a well known term, and there are MANY pages on wikipedia about sexual terms like this. Teabagging is a good example, and a turkey slap is a much more well known term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.67.66 (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Longhair 05:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Everyking 05:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, unfortunately. Teabagging seems to be a different practice that would need its windmilling component separated out (split) anyway. —Pengo 06:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep i had a comment before, but id just like to mention this term isn't native to australia. i spent 6 months in stockholm last year and people there knew what it meant. like the swedes who spoke english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.43.10 (talk • contribs)
- Keep This is not something that has only happened in Big Brother, and the term has been used many times before Big Brother Australia. --JD[don't talk|email] 10:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- KeepI see no reason why this should be deleted.--Sebjac 15:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- KeepWell known term. -Starlet 00:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - what?? It's sexual assault, whatever fancy name you want to give it. -- 9cds(talk) 08:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I can understand it being an offensive term, but that itself does not merit deletion. Deletion would have to be judged upon (sigh, I can't believe I am saying this) on whether or not it is a notable form of somekind of sexual assault. There are quite a few of sexual slang terms that exist on Wikipedia that are ptobably a felony or considered immoral. But that exist on here because in someway, shape or form, they are notable. Some examples are: this, this, this, this (which survived AfD twice, and others. So, I don't think how offensive, degrading, or revolting the term is merits deletion in this circumstance. Yanksox 11:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Yanksox, and I second everything he says - well put. If only encyclopedias could be restrictive, eh? Srose talk 11:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Keep it. Encyclopedias should not be self-censoring.
- Keep per all above. In particular, a redirect would not be appropriate as (and I can't believe I'm typing this in an AfD) teabagging is not the same thing as turkeyslapping -- Synapse 20:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Yanksox. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Distinct notable concept. Ansell 04:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.