- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete at 11. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Turn to News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, just a list of unrelated news networks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment unsourced, and therefore seems to contain orginal rsearch. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 12:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 20:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication or evidence of notability. PKT(alk) 21:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I still have no idea what it's meant to be about. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.