- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's a joke,,,,ha ha ha ha ha....Ariele 05:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers 05:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: from the same author, User:128.235.249.80, we have: Eagle Kung Fu, Golden Snake Kung Fu, Lion Kung Fu, Rat Kung Fu, Snake Kung Fu and Turtle Kung Fu. Of these, some look like real articles, and some look like junk. Perhaps a martial arts expert can tell us which ones are real? We currently have two Kung Fu articles on todays AfD. Jamie (talk/contribs) 05:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete So obscure that even most devotees of Kung fu don't know about it. Even if it is a real but extremely obscure variant, is it something many people would want to look up in an encyclopedia? Not in my book. Chris the speller 17:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even if real, it is vanishingly non-notable. There are no schools for this style that I have ever heard of, either in China or the West. While the turtle is an important animal in Taoist imagery, the article cites no sources for its assertions. --Fire Star 21:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article's kung fu is weak. —Brim 07:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.