- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tweetware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article do not meet WP:NEO. It is relatively new term for a new license term which do not meet the threshold of being NOTABLE. Amartyabag TALK2ME 15:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable neologism. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to only have been used for MockApp, which doesn't seem to be notable either. Not widely used, not widely discussed, not notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nominator, not notable, and Wikipedia is not the urban dictionary --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Plaintive plaintiff (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Isn't notable. — ṞṈ™ 03:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.