Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Complex: A Ballad of Two Fractured Humans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 23:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twisted Complex: A Ballad of Two Fractured Humans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published novel which five days ago was described as "upcoming" but is now "being circulated via small Atlanta bookstores and various conventions". No independent reference supplied, none found. Clearly fails Notability (books) - see Threshold standards. Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per the first paragraph. Joe Chill (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Francium12 (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. Also spam-like. Capitalismojo (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there is no coverage. This one was pretty much self-nominating -- Whpq (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article itself expresses non-notability. Edward321 (talk) 09:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as above, the article makes an excellent case for its own non-notability. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.