- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not a significant website as far as I can tell and the whole thing reads as an advertisement. It's been tagged for a while for notability and lack of sources. Contributors to the article are all single-purpose accounts which doesn't really help to dispel the feeling of WP:COI or WP:SPAM issues. Of course, I might be wrong but I don't see how this meets WP:WEB. Pascal.Tesson 16:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even overlooking the COI or spam problem, the article seems to still fail WP:N, and needs attribution anyway. --Dennisthe2 16:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails multiple policies, notably WP:NOTE and WP:ATT --Haemo 20:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. . Mukadderat 17:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.