Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two-Year Quarterly Data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Tnxman307. Zetawoof (ζ) 15:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two-Year Quarterly Data (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be sourced to one SPS. it reads like someones opinion and not an encylopedic entry (and may be very OR indead). It may violate copyrihgt (as it reads like a direct quote. And may be pormotional (the saem author has used the saem sources to create or edit very similar article.Slatersteven (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Two sentences, very little context. Almost certainly a copyvio, given the author's history. Zetawoof (ζ) 15:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.