Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Pin Din

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two Pin Din

Only released one album, doesn't meet the criteria at WP:BAND. JD554 (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two-album criterion is only one of the 12 notability guidelines for musical groups. Another one is "has at least one notable member" which clearly applies to Andy Kerr. There may be a case for merging the band to the musician until the band meets more criteria to stand on its own, but it certainly doesn't need deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw: I'd missed the Andy Kerr link. --JD554 (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I would argue that the band is notable above and beyond the significance of Kerr (and thus should not be moved to his personal article) due to the significance of band member Wilf Plum, whose involvement with Dog Faced Hermans, another popular and influential experimental punk band, makes the group significant beyond Kerr and thus qualified for its own article. Colinclarksmith (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]