Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:15, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Knight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unsourced BLP or sourced to personal bio and AVN nomination listings. Subject fails PORNBIO as the awards listed are not significant and well known. Sufficient RS coverage is not available to meet GNG. Previously dePRODed. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per WP:BLP, as an article about a living person with no reliable sources. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's accurate analysis. The small pile of nominations for appearing in group sex scenes really does nothing to support individual notability, and the article contains no non-trivial reliably sourced biographical content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable porn actress, Can't find any evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO with only scene-related award wins. "Mainstream" work consists of low-billed appearances is a softcore series, far short of PORNBIO criterion #3. No reliable source coverage to satisfy GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the awards are minor and a lack of rs coverage so WP:BASIC is not passed Atlantic306 (talk) 19:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the other users --SamWinchester000 (talk) 18:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.