Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Gas and Electric

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:09, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Gas and Electric

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

U.S. Gas and Electric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company that doesn't have WP:SIGCOV. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Weird though it may be that a utility company would escape notability, there's virtually no news or history about this thing, and the article is very promotional. FalconK (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is more of an Energy service company vs an electric utility. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:39, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funny enough, one of their subsidies is "Energy Services Providers, Inc." which they acquired in 2009. [1] – The Grid (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing significant in Google News, or Newsbank Access Global Newsbank database. But I did find a list of awards and honours on an archived version of their website but on further investigation they're finalists but not winners, and according to WP:ORG this would only count as trivial coverage. SallyRenee (talk) 11:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.