Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U5cms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U5cms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete as advertisement. Page U5cms has been speedy-deleted and restarted twice, the second time with this message to me: "Dear Anthony Appleyard, you have deleted the article u5cms. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#G11 this was not promotional: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The u5cms article (about a Content Management System) is the same style and category as many others in Wikipedia, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TangoCMS. The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems gives an overview concerning these systems with Links to the respective Wikipedia-Articles. The subject "CMS" is present in Wikipedia and for a encyclopaedia it is important to be complete. If you think the u5cms article does not meet the standards, please let me know how to make it better (please do not delete it). 11:14, 2 August 2014‎ User:Stemind". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this free software has not received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. That does not mean that it is not important, but it does mean that it fails Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It fails the general notability guidelines. See also the essay Wikipedia:Notability (software). The author has chosen only related sites as references. I have found mentions in blogs but nothing that constitutes an independent reliable source. --Bejnar (talk) 05:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Not seeing much in the way of WP:RS that discusses the topic. Does not meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—CMS used at the University of Bern (http://ufive.unibe.ch/?c=u5cmspage) with growing number of users, therefore meets WP:NSOFT. Listed on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems; interesting tool for universities. 14:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.5.216.100 (talk)

Use at one university does not equate with notability even under the essay WP:NSOFT. --Bejnar (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: lacks significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May be do not delete: Hello, here a comment from the authors of the u5CMS. May be this page helps for your decission: http://studmed.unibe.ch/a-z/page.php?id=u5cms it is in german but translates well with google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ufive (talk • contribs) 07:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No it does not. it is just another University of Bern citation, see above, from an SPA account. --Bejnar (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.