Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO: Alien Invasion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anas ^talk? 17:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UFO: Alien Invasion

Contested prod from 2nd June. Prod reason was: I've looked for independent references, and although there are entries on IGN, Gamespy, Strategyinformer etc these are trivial directory entries; there is nothing to satisfy WP:V or WP:N. Prod removed by an anonymous user. A note on the talk page does mention a possible reference from Games for Windows: The Official Magazine, but hasn't surfaced yet, so don't know if this is a trivial mention or not. Marašmusïne_Talk 17:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marašmusïne_Talk 17:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, to confirm that reference. While Google searches aren't meaningful, I did notice a significant number of sites referencing that game in particular (outside of wikipedia). --Sigma 7 03:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Potential source here. Not sure of the reliability of the site, but looks kosher to me: [1] JulesH 12:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That site came up recently in another AfD. Whilst Cybrid is a staff member for LinuxGames, there doesn't appear to be any 'editorial oversight' per WP:Reliable sources. But still, it's a start. Marašmusïne_Talk 16:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; I'm pretty sure this was mentioned nontrivially in Pelit a few months back, but I can't find it from the few issues I have at hand right now... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While there are no strong sources, there are a LOT of weak ones. While this in itself doesn't justify it's stay, it is a relatively well known game among the Linux community (one of the few that are always brought up when discussing "good games for Linux"), and the project itself is of a variety that tends to get articles. Again, not that this is a justification in itself, but the article is harmless. Patch86 13:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment the article doesn't have any independent references at all. Since WP:V is Wikipedia policy, can some be found to put in there? Marašmusïne_Talk 13:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.