Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UGC 10310

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list. (non-admin closure) WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UGC 10310

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

UGC 10310 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, no non-catalogue, non-database sources. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: No significant coverage found. It can be redirected to the Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, where it is listed. Praemonitus (talk) 18:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list (and maybe merge some content to the Notes column). The galaxy UGC 10310 or Arp 2 lacks significant coverage; the cited references are photos of the galaxy on astrophotography websites. Not to be confused with the globular cluster Arp 2, which does have significant coverage. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list, this lacks notability but at least has a related article to redirect on. 21 Andromedae (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list – Per above. Svartner (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list. I agree with the others. Reverosie (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Catalog list. Although there are some studies mentioning about the object, not much details are covered. Perhaps if this gains significant coverage sometime in the future, this could be made into a standalone article. I agree redirecting it per nom. Galaxybeing (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.