- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE – Juliancolton | Talk 00:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- UGC 8690 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NASTRO, there is nothing notable about this galaxy. Lithopsian (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I checked SIMBAD and WikiSky for papers on the galaxy; I couldn't really find any. P. S. I've noticed VirtualDave making some articles on various galaxies, what order is he/she making them in? They don't seem to be in particular order, and the creation of UGC 8690, which isn't an NGC object, surprised me. Loooke (talk) 00:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 08:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 08:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.